[I wrote a review]

edit

I wrote a review of the Colour Genie for Computing Today magazine in 1983. It is online at:

http://www.webweavers.co.nz/system-80/hardware_colour%20genie_review.htm

A shorter and slightly earlier review, from Your Computer magazine, is at:

http://www.gondolin.org.uk/hchof/reviews/yc-colour-genie.html

Sng 21:37, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

File:C kong.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:C kong.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Does its CPU really differ from the TRS80 one ?

edit

It doesn't seem so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.193.172.200 (talk) 07:46, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Removed uncited claims focused on company, not computer

edit

Have removed uncited claims added in this edit that:-

The company went bankrott, when its founder leave it with a suitcase of money. TCS in Germany St, Augustin, near Bonn went bankrott later.

The company has its own article- EACA- and having this smack in the middle of a description intended to focus on the computer itself is out of place. These claims would still require citation if they were to go in the company article.

Ubcule (talk) 20:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply