Talk:Chapter 27

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleChapter 27 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 9, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Sources

edit

Include mtv.com [1] and The Movie Insider [2]. RadioKirk 22:33, 6 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Ice cream as a weight gain is from the June 15th, 2006 episode of Loveline with guest 30 Seconds to Mars. There are many behind the scene stories told about halfway through the episode, if anybody would like to add to this entry. 69.162.59.13 09:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


Leto as David

edit

I read that plays John Lennon not the killer. --Kingforaday1620 21:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

That is incorrect. Leto plays Mark David Chapman. Michaelh2001 16:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Page move

edit

I've moved this article from Chapter 27 (film) to Chapter 27, per a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves. There was a non-trivial edit history at Chapter 27 already, as well as some talk page content, so I've swapped the two pages, and the history that was previously at Chapter 27 can now be found at Chapter 27 (film). The talk page that used to be Talk:Chapter 27 is now at Talk:Chapter 27 (film). -GTBacchus(talk) 23:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Mark Lindsey Chapman" plays John Lennon?

edit

That statement in the trivia section contradicts the actual cast list in the article. Which one's the correct one? --Foot Dragoon 05:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

I think those "boycott Chapter 27" links should be removed. I insist on it. relation of contnet of those sites to topic is very odd, plus one of those sites is blog. Sthow 15:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

what is the movie about

edit

I just want a synopsis all of this background info is not telling me much

Trivia??

edit

The following content was earlier removed as uncited (which it was). I restored it with a citation, and it has now been removed as trivia.

Prior to playing Lennon in this film, actor Mark Lindsay Chapman (then employing a different name because of another actor named Mark Chapman) had been rejected for the role of John Lennon for the film John and Yoko: A Love Story because of the similarity of his name to Lennon's killer.[1]

This doesn't really strike me as all that trivial. (Incidentally, he was initially using the name Mark Lindsay) MLC was vetoed from the first film by Yoko Ono herself, over which she had some creative control, but got to play Lennon here in a film she didn't approve of making to begin. It seems to me this is of broad interest. MLChapman's initial rejection from the Lennon role in Ballad of John and Yoko got a great deal of press attention, though his recasting as Lennon in this film got relatively little.--WickerGuy (talk) 22:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

About a week ago, I restored this material in vastly expanded form and no one has objected.--WickerGuy (talk) 20:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
I think that the actual material is good. Now it is not so trivial.--Earthh (talk) 21:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Marill, Alvin (1987). Movies made for television: the telefeature and the mini-series, 1964-1986. New York Zoetrope. p. 214. ISBN 0918432804, 9780918432803. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chapter 27. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Pressurise

edit

Why is there a "sic" after this word? That's the standard spelling. (To be thoroughly accurate, it's the standard spelling in international English.) I don't believe we normally "sic" quoted Americanisms in international-text entries or quoted international spellings in American-text entries, but I didn't remove this one in case I'm mistaken. Laodah 18:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Chapter 27. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply