Talk:Budots

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a playlist of budots music features excerpts from speeches of Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte? Source: Budots eventually made its way into parody. In 2017, Philippine electronic music collective BuwanBuwan composed a playlist of budots music with clips from Duterte’s speeches and released it on Soundcloud.

Created by TreseTrese (talk). Self-nominated at 05:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC).

• @TreseTrese: It seems to be your first nomination, however the article was moved to main space on 28-September, 26 days from today. The normal rules define 7 days for the article being new. Even allowing for an extra 7 days leniency for new nominators as per WT:Did you know#Rule D9, this can't be allowed. I see the only way for making a DYK is to make it a Good Article. Make sure to read the WP:DYKRULES before nominating an article for DYK. Roller26 (talk) 11:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

• If you look at the history, the article was originally created in the sandbox. The draft waited 3 weeks to be reviewed and approved. An admin then commented that another article was created on the main space on 22 October 2020 and it was suggested that the stub be merged to the draft. Since draft articles cannot be nominated for DYK, I believe this article should be counted on the day that stub was created. TreseTrese (talk) 17:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
• I also would like to point out this specific ruling under WP:DYKRULES: Articles that have been worked on exclusively in a user or user talk subpage or at articles for creation or in the Draft namespace and then moved (or in some cases pasted) to the article mainspace are considered new as of the date they reach the mainspace. I rest my case. TreseTrese (talk) 18:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

• @TreseTrese:, apologies for the mistake. The article's history seemed pretty confusing to me. However the DYK check tool said that it moved from your sandbox to mainspace on 28-September. I am still pretty new at reviewing DYKs and hadn't come across such an issue. I have reviewed and approved the DYK. Roller26 (talk) 05:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: First nomination hence no need for QPQ. The article is new as per the nominators comment above. Good to go Roller26 (talk) 05:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)