Talk:Boot Hill (role-playing game)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by ShannonA in topic Chronology Backward
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boot Hill (role-playing game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Chronology Backward

edit

The chronology for Boot Hill and Empire of the Petal Throne is backward. (This is in reference to: "Boot Hill was TSR's third role-playing game, appearing not long after Dungeons & Dragons and Empire of the Petal Throne", which appears at two places in the article.)

Boot Hill is listed as coming soon in Strategic Review #2 (Summer 1975) and available for sale by Strategic Review #3 (Autumn 1975), while EPT is first mentioned in SR #3, with intended release of mid-July 1975 and available for sale in Strategic Review #4 (Winter 1975). Locking that down, Boot Hill's Foreword is dated May 1st, EPT's Intro is dated July 1st. Yes, that means the old TSR chronology at WotC was inaccurate (and I generally would not consider it a trustworthy source).

I suspect that the reason for the incorrect chronology is that EPT is often called TSR's second RPG (after D&D). But, that's because Boot Hill first edition was mainly a man-to-man war game, with the roleplaying elements only appearing in its 1979 second edition, not because of the chronology. (The main arguments for Boot Hill being an RPG anyway? The individual scale and the optional campaign rules, which can extend play over "several years". I personally count Boot Hill as the second RPG at TSR, but that's a minority view.)

ShannonA (talk) 06:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply