Talk:Boole's rule
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boole's rule article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Speedy deletion rationale
editYes, there is a rule by this name, but the current content doesn't say anything about it, other than the fact that because of a typo in some work a while back, some people think it's called something else. Until someone actually wants to write an article about it, let's remove the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 00:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, there is sufficient context to identify the subject, so I have declined the speedy. Of course, there's always WP:PROD and WP:AfD if you still want to pursue deletion. decltype (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Ubale source
editWhile the journal on which Ubale is published may be predatory, please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Predatory journals in that the issue is that the source should not be considered peer reviewed. In this case, what is written by Ubale is mathematically correct, so the issue of not being peer-reveiwed is less relevant. Math does not lie (although errors can exist :) ). -- Avi (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Moot. Less-accessible but non-predatory source found. -- Avi (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Converting Lisp to Python
editVery few numerical coders today would use Lisp. would anyone object to my rewriting the example code implementing this rule in Python? Joezuntz (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)