Talk:2020 German Masters/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 07:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Will review. MWright96 (talk) 07:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit

Format

edit

Prize fund

edit

Tournament summary

edit

Main draw

edit

Qualifying stage centuries

edit
  • "The highest was a 143 made by Tom Ford in his second qualifying round." - I feel that this sentence should include the opponent Ford played against when he made the highest break of the qualifying stage

References

edit

The main issues are statements that are not verified by some of the citations and some problems with the Prose. Also, some of the references are lacking the basic parameters such as the publication date and the access date. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 08:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply