Talk:2020 Cagua fire
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Eddie891 in topic Did you know nomination
This page was proposed for deletion by Lettler (talk · contribs) on 20 January 2021. |
A fact from 2020 Cagua fire appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Incendio de Cagua from es.wikipedia. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Eddie891 (talk) 22:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ...that eleven people, nine of them underage, died in a sugar plantation fire in Cagua, Venezuela, while trying to hunt rabbits? Source: El Nacional
- Comment: This is my first time nominating a DYK; any feedback or suggestions to either the nomination or the article are welcome!
5x expanded by NoonIcarus (talk). Self-nominated at 14:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC).
- Welcome to DYK! This is a new enough and long enough expansion, and you do not need a QPQ as this is your first nomination. Before I could really review the article, I noted that the writing (mostly translation from eswiki) needed a significant amount of improvement to be idiomatic and flow properly in English. (Ojalá que los cambios que acabo de hacer te ayuden para mejorar tu inglés escrito.) The hook fact is in the article with cited source that checks out ([1] is also used by the hook) and is interesting. This should be ready and is a good example of an article rescue from PROD. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the feedback and with the help proofreading! I'll make sure to take a look at the reviewing guide for future nominations, as well as take further care with translation. --NoonIcarus (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)