Talk:2014 World Snooker Championship

Latest comment: 4 years ago by BennyOnTheLoose in topic GA Review
Featured article2014 World Snooker Championship is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 29, 2020Good article nomineeListed
August 13, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on May 7, 2014.
Current status: Featured article

Preliminary qualifying?

edit
  Resolved

I noticed that recent articles on the world championship have that, but it's absent this year. Is that because no preliminary qualifying took place or is it because it just hasn't been added? In the former case, a note to explain why this was the first championship for many years not to feature that would be informative. (I looked and can't find reference to it taking place.) Thanks and keep up the good work. Valenciano (talk) 19:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

It didn't take place this year. Unfortunately such a note can't be added, as no reliable source contains any explanation, why it was eliminated this year. Armbrust The Homunculus 19:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
It's explained in this info from World Snooker, note 4: "In the event that places become available should any player not enter an event, places will be filled on an event by event basis using the Q School 2013 order of merit to fill any places up to the 128 entries required. " Whether or not this merits inclusion in this article I leave to others to decide. Best regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 23:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I don't think that's needed, it's not mentioned for the other ranking event articles of this season either. Also it doesn't really address the absence of the preliminary qualifying. (The "filling empty places from the Q School order of merit" principle was used last year too, and there were preliminary rounds.) Armbrust The Homunculus 23:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Semi-final section

edit
  Resolved

In the semi-final section it states that Robertson has lost his number 1 spot having lost to Mark Selby which is correct, but is it not premature to say he lost it to Ding as Selby could be number 1 if was to win the final. Surely Ding's position is not official till the tournament is over. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

You're right.   Fixed. Armbrust The Homunculus 17:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 18:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit
  Resolved

This page should not be speedily deleted because... It is a valuable article to Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicefood (talkcontribs) 00:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:Ma3kkad3kda2 who added the speedily deletion template has been blocked indefinitely for vandalism, nothing to worry about. - FakirNL (talk) 15:11, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on 2014 World Snooker Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2014 World Snooker Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on 2014 World Snooker Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014 World Snooker Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2014 World Snooker Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 00:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Happy to discuss, or be challenged on, any of my comments. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio and plagiarism check

  • I checked all matches showing above 4% on Earwig's Copyvio detector. No concerns.

Sources

Format

Prize fund

Tournament summary

Qualifying

First round

Second round

Quarter-finals

  • Looks fine.

Semi-finals

  • "O'Sullivan played Hawkins contested the first semi-final.." - slight reword required. I changed it to " O'Sullivan and Hawkins contested the first semi-final.."
  • The "Rampant Ronnie races into final" source is now credited to Hector Nunns on the live site, but to David Hendon (as per the reference here) on the archived copy. I don't know if any change is required for this.

Final

  • "The third session concluded after just six of the scheduled eight frames" - presumably because time ran out, I suggest stating the reason if possible.
    • Source says Eight frames were scheduled for the session but it was a measure of the attritional nature of the action that they could only fit six in before the interval. - so you could infer a few things, but this borders on OR. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "127 and 87— came consecutively" is not supported by the source used here. Also - were they in consecutive visits, or just in consecutive frames?

Main draw

Qualifying

Images

Lead