Help talk:Introduction/Conclusion
(Redirected from Help talk:Introduction to Wikipedia conclusion)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Wbm1058 in topic Requested move 1 July 2020
This is not the page to ask for help or make test edits.
To make test edits, please use the Sandbox. For other help, please see our main help page. |
Feedback from new editors on the tutorial series is collected here. To leave feedback, please . |
Other talk page banners | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 1 July 2020
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 18:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Help:Introduction to Wikipedia conclusion → Help:Introduction/Conclusion – better format. Interstellarity (talk) 17:31, 30 June 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. © Tbhotch™ (en-3). 04:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 05:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Conditional oppose. I agree with the nominator that the hierarchy structure of the Help:Intro series is not as good as it could be. Ideally, everything would be cleanly nested under Help:Introduction (this would've made it easier to implement the editnotice, for instance). However, that would come with some tradeoffs to readability—the current Help:Introduction to images with Wiki Markup/3 reads better than a nested Help:Introduction/Images/Wiki Markup/3 would. Given that, I think WP:BROKE becomes the tiebreaker — it's not something worth the effort/disruption to change. If someone felt very strongly and came up with a full scheme for what to rename every page in the series, I'd give it a good look and might end up supporting, but renaming just this one page doesn't make sense, especially given that it isn't a subpage of Help:Introduction to Wikipedia in the first place. The proper rename would be Help:Introduction/Conclusion. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 02:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- As one aside, in case it comes up, per WP:NCCAPS, page titles are sentence case. We see that elsewhere in the Help:Intro series with page titles like Help:Introduction to images with Wiki Markup/1. So the lowercase "c" is correct for the current formulation, although we'd want to capitalize it as proposed if we did switch to using subpages. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 02:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Sdkb: I will change my proposal to the title you suggested. Interstellarity (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- As one aside, in case it comes up, per WP:NCCAPS, page titles are sentence case. We see that elsewhere in the Help:Intro series with page titles like Help:Introduction to images with Wiki Markup/1. So the lowercase "c" is correct for the current formulation, although we'd want to capitalize it as proposed if we did switch to using subpages. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 02:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support something. Right now, the title implies that the page is an introduction to something called a "Wikipedia conclusion". -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.