The clausula (Latin for "little close” or “little conclusion"; plural clausulae) was a newly composed section of discant ("note against note") inserted into a pre-existing setting of organum. Clausulae flourished in the late twelfth and thirteenth centuries and were associated with the Notre Dame school. The origin of the clausula has long been subject of scholarly debate, as the relationship between clausulae and motets is very complicated.[1] Clausulae eventually became used as substitutes for passages of original plainchant. They occur as melismatic figures based on a single word or syllable within an organum.

Origins

edit

Clausulae emerged from the compositional practices of the Notre Dame school in Paris c. 1160–1250 (during the stylistic period known as ars antiqua). The composers Léonin and Pérotin in particular contributed heavily in composing clausulae. Rather than write entirely new music, the preference was to take existing music, that is, plainchant melodies, and develop or improve upon them. According to an English author known as Anonymous IV (c. 1280), "Pérotin was better at making clausulae than Léonin had been in that Pérotin was better at making better discant style of clausulae."[2] The appearance of clausulae provided the first rhythmic system.[3] (It is hard to find rhythmic notation in the earliest motets because of the lack of the use of clear rhythmic notation in the manuscripts.)[3] Pérotin's clausulae make use of the rhythmic modes, whose strict metrical feet necessitated that voices change notes together (discantus). This was in contrast to the earlier practice of one voice moving in a free rhythm above a "tenor" voice (Latin tenere: "to hold") sustaining the long notes of a cantus firmus. The tenor line was often repeated to allow for expansion of the clausula; this was the origin of the technique known as isorhythm.

The scholarly debate over the origin of the clausula continues. However, the term clausula already used in ancient Roman rhetoric, where it denoted "a rhythmic figure used to add finesse and finality to the end of a sentence or phrase."[4] In particular, rather than seeing clausula as a genre, the part composed in the style of discantus with a definite final cadence was called clausula. Thus, there are more studies that relate specifically to the motet, rather than studies of the origin of the clausula. One scholar writes that "the motet arose through the addition of Latin texts to the melismatic upper voices of the two-voice clausulae and was thereby able to explain for the first time the previously baffling and unprecedented verse structures of many motet texts."[5] Others claim that by the removal of the text of a motet in its original composition, it was changed into a clausula.[5] As the relationship between clausulae and motets is very complicated, there are conflicting conclusions on whether the clausula or the motet came first. Instead, the relationship between the two is complexly intertwined and closely influenced by each other.[6]

Function and development

edit

Clausulae enriched pre-existing settings of organum.[5] Hundreds of clausulae in two, three and four parts were incorporated into the Magnus Liber Organi of Léonin and Pérotin. Others were arranged in liturgical order within manuscripts so that they could be easily introduced into a particular organum setting or piece of plainchant. As they were notated separately, it was possible for them to be expanded and developed further, and they eventually became standalone pieces which could be sung at certain points in the liturgy. At that time, there were some clausulae that people liked or were particularly popular, for example, those composed on the tenor REGNAT from the verse of the Ascension Alleluia Hodie Maria virgo in the early thirteenth-century.[7] Over time, the appearance and use of clausula changed little by little, but the images of clausula found in different times and regions still had similar characters.[7] Some clausula matched the melodic lines from the French motet without text. This is an important clue to the eventual transformation of clausula into the form of motet.[8] The composition of clausulae died out in the mid-13th century as they were replaced by motets as the main platform for the development of new compositional techniques. Norman Smith claimed that the music of pre-existing clausulae in three early thirteenth-century Latin motets in the Florence Manuscript resemble each other so much that it's hard to find differences in rhythms between the motet and the clausula, which clearly exists. However the difference reflects the artistic changes that occurred in the process of texting clausula.[9] Obviously, possibilities and usefulness of clausula played a pivotal role in the creation of an important musical genre called the motet.[5]

References

edit
  1. ^ A Critical Companion to Medieval Motets (NED - New ed.). Boydell & Brewer. 2018. doi:10.2307/j.ctvc16pzc. ISBN 978-1-78327-307-2. JSTOR j.ctvc16pzc.
  2. ^ Gross, Guillaume (2006). "Organum at Notre-Dame in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries: rhetoric in words and music". Plainsong & Medieval Music. 15 (2): 87–108. doi:10.1017/S0961137106000349. ISSN 1474-0087. S2CID 163135639.
  3. ^ a b Martínez-Göllner, Marie Louise (2019-01-24). "Mode and change of mode in the 13th-century motet". Anuario Musical (52): 3. doi:10.3989/anuariomusical.1997.i52.286. ISSN 1988-4125.
  4. ^ "Clausula (rhetoric)", Wikipedia, 2020-11-16, retrieved 2020-12-12
  5. ^ a b c d Smith, Norman E. (1989). "The Earliest Motets: Music and Words". Journal of the Royal Musical Association. 114 (2): 141–163. doi:10.1093/jrma/114.2.141. ISSN 0269-0403. JSTOR 766528.
  6. ^ Bradley, Catherine A. (2015-04-01). "Re-workings and Chronological Dynamics in a Thirteenth-Century Latin Motet Family". Journal of Musicology. 32 (2): 153–197. doi:10.1525/jm.2015.32.2.153. ISSN 0277-9269.
  7. ^ a b BRADLEY, CATHERINE A. (2014). "Comparing Compositional Process in Two Thirteenth-Century Motets: Pre-existent Materials in Deus omnium/REGNAT and Ne m'oubliez mie/DOMINO". Music Analysis. 33 (3): 263–290. doi:10.1111/musa.12029. ISSN 0262-5245. JSTOR 43864540.
  8. ^ Bradley, Catherine A. (2013). "Contrafacta and Transcribed Motets". Early Music History. 32: 1–70. doi:10.1017/S0261127913000016. ISSN 0261-1279. JSTOR 26379236.
  9. ^ Bradley, Catherine A. (2012). "New Texts for Old Music: Three Early Thirteenth-Century Latin Motets". Music & Letters. 93 (2): 149–169. doi:10.1093/ml/gcs034. ISSN 0027-4224. JSTOR 41684164. S2CID 194958313.