ARINC 653 (Avionics Application Software Standard Interface) is a software specification for space and time partitioning in safety-critical avionics real-time operating systems (RTOS). It allows the hosting of multiple applications of different software levels on the same hardware in the context of an Integrated Modular Avionics architecture.[1]

It is part of ARINC 600-Series Standards for Digital Aircraft & Flight Simulators.

Overview

edit

In order to decouple the real-time operating system platform from the application software, ARINC 653 defines an API called APplication EXecutive (APEX).

Each application software is called a partition and has its own memory space. It also has a dedicated time slot allocated by the APEX API. Within each partition, multitasking is allowed. The APEX API provides services to manage partitions, processes and timing, as well as partition/process communication and error handling. The partitioning environment can be implemented by using a hypervisor[2] to map partitions to virtual machines, but this is not required.

The standard is overseen by the AEEC APEX Subcommittee[1].

History

edit

Initial version

edit

The initial version of ARINC 653 was published on October 10, 1996.

ARINC 653-1

edit

Supplement 1 was published in January 1997 and introduced the concepts of APEX and Time and Space partitioning.

ARINC 653-2

edit

Supplement 2 was published in 3 parts between March 2006 and January 2007:[3]

  • Part 1 (mandatory services): ARINC 653 partition management, Cold start and warm start definition, Application software error handling, ARINC 653 compliance, Ada and C language bindings;
  • Part 2 (optional services): File system access, Data logging, Service Access points, ...
  • Part 3 (Conformity Test Specification);

Current Organization of Standard

edit
  • Part 0 - Introduction to ARINC 653 (currently at revision 3, released November 2021)[4]
  • Part 1 - Required Services (currently at revision 5, released December 2019)[5]
  • Part 2 - Extended Services (currently at revision 4, released December 2019)[6]
  • Part 3A - Conformity Test Specification for Required Services (currently at revision 2, released November 2021)[7]
  • Part 3B - Conformity Test Specification for Extended Services (currently at revision c1, released July 2019)[8]
  • Part 4 - Subset Services (currently at revision 0, released June 2012)[9]
  • Part 5 - Core Software Recommended Capabilities (currently at revision 1, released August 2019)[10]


Basic principles of partitioning

edit

ARINC 653 Platform

edit

An ARINC 653 platform contains:

  • A hardware platform allowing real-time computing deterministic services.
  • An abstraction layer managing the timer and space partitioning constraints of the platform (memory, CPU, Input/output).
  • An implementation for the ARINC 653 services (the APEX API).
  • An interface to be able to configure the platform and its domain of use.
  • Various instrumentation tools.

Initialization

edit

Initialization of an ARINC 653 partition creates resources used by the partition. Resources creation (PROCESS, EVENT, SEMAPHORE...) is performed by calling API services named CREATE_xxxx.

Error handling

edit

The process error handler is a preemptive process of the highest priority dedicated to handle partition exceptions. It is created by the service CREATE_ERROR_HANDLER during partition initialization.

The API allows the error handler to stop a faulty process (STOP_SELF). In that case, the RTOS scheduler will elicit the next process with the highest priority.

ARINC 653 does not specify how the scheduler should behave if the error handler does not stop a faulty process. In some (theoretical) cases, this could lead to an infinite loop between the faulty process and the error handler.

The error handler can obtain information about the source and the context of the exception.

Mode management

edit

Each partition can be in several activation modes:

  • COLD_START and WARM_START: Only the initialization process is executed,
  • NORMAL: The initialization process is stopped, and the other partition processes are called by the RTOS scheduler depending on their priority,
  • IDLE: No process is executed. However an implementation could still in theory execute a hidden process of the lowest priority, for example to start an infinite loop.

The SET_PARTITION_MODE service allows to manage these states. It can be called by any process in the partition. Entering the IDLE state is irreversible for the partition. Only an external event (such as a platform restart) can change the state to another mode when the partition is in this state.

Partition and process scheduling

edit

The standard defines a two-level hierarchical schedule. The first level schedules the partitions. This is a round-robin, fixed schedule that repeats a Major Time Frame. The Major Time Frame schedules each partition in a fixed duration Minor Time Frame with a fixed offset from the start of the Major Time Frame.

 
ARINC 653 Partition Schedule

Within the Minor Time Frame, the second level uses process scheduling. Each partition has at least one process. Process scheduling within a Minor Time Frame is preemptive. The scheduler is called either by a timer or by API services.

Multicore

edit

ARINC 653 P1-5 was updated to address multicore processor architectures. Section 4.2.1 "O/S Multicore Implementation Compliance" indicates that an OS designed for multi-core processing should support two cases:

  • Use of multiple cores by a single partition (whose processes span multiple cores)
  • Use of multiple cores by multiple partitions

The position paper CAST-32A defines a set of requirements and guidance that should be met to certify and use multi-core processors in civil aviation by FAA and is expected to be replaced by an Advisory Circular, AC 20-193. The European Union aviation authority, EASA, published AMC 20-193 in January 2022.[11]

API services

edit

The ARINC 653 APEX services are API calls belonging in six categories:

  • Partition management
  • Process management
  • Time management
  • Inter-partition communication
  • Intra-partition communication
  • Error handling

No ARINC 653 services are provided for the memory management of partitions. Each partition has to handle its own memory (still under the constraints of memory partitioning enforced by ARINC 653).

Each service returns a RETURN_CODE value which indicates if the call has been successful:

  • NO_ERROR: the service performed nominally after a valid request
  • NO_ACTION: the state of the system has not changed after executing the service
  • NOT_AVAILABLE: the service is temporarily unavailable
  • INVALID_PARAM: at least one of the service's parameters is invalid
  • INVALID_CONFIG: at least one of the service's parameters is incompatible with the current configuration of the system
  • INVALID_MODE: the service is incompatible with the current mode of the system
  • TIMED_OUT: the delay for the execution of the service has expired
edit

The field covered by ARINC 653 is similar to ASAAC Def Stan 00-74. However, there are differences between the two standards.[12]

Some ARINC 653 (APEX) calls have a POSIX equivalent, but are different from how they are defined in POSIX.[12]

For example, the following call defined in ASAAC:

 receiveBuffer

would be translated in ARINC 653 by:

 RECEIVE_BUFFER()

and also in POSIX by:

 recv()

References

edit
  1. ^ "ARINC 653 - An Avionics Standard for Safe, Partitioned Systems" (PDF). Wind River Systems / IEEE Seminar. August 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-10-07. Retrieved 2009-05-30.
  2. ^ VanderLeest, S. H. (2010-10-01). "ARINC 653 hypervisor". 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. pp. 5.E.2–1–5.E.2–20. doi:10.1109/DASC.2010.5655298. ISBN 978-1-4244-6616-0. S2CID 5784484.
  3. ^ "Product Focus: ARINC 653 and RTOS". aviationtoday.com. 2004-07-01. Archived from the original on 2009-12-03. Retrieved 2009-05-30.
  4. ^ "Avionics Application Software Standard Interface: ARINC Specification 653 Part 0". Aeronautical Radio, Inc. 2019-12-23. Archived from the original on 2022-02-03.
  5. ^ "Avionics Application Software Standard Interface: ARINC Specification 653P1-3, Required Services". Aeronautical Radio, Inc. 2022-02-04. Archived from the original on 2020-08-12. Retrieved 2022-02-04.
  6. ^ "Avionics Application Software Standard Interface: ARINC Specification 653P2-2, Part 2, Extended Services". Aeronautical Radio, Inc. 2019-12-23. Archived from the original on 2020-08-12. Retrieved 2022-02-04.
  7. ^ "653P3A-2 Avionics Application Software Standard Interface, Part 3A, Conformity Test Specifications for ARINC 653 Required Services". SAE ITC. 2021-11-17. Retrieved 2022-02-04.
  8. ^ "653P3Bc1 Avionics Application Software Standard Interface, Part 3B, Conformity Test Specifications for ARINC 653 Extended Services". SAE ITC. 2019-07-18. Retrieved 2022-02-04.
  9. ^ "Avionics Application Software Standard Interface: ARINC Specification 653 Part 4, Subset Services". Aeronautical Radio, Inc. 2012-06-01. Archived from the original on 2012-08-25. Retrieved 2013-10-20.
  10. ^ "653P5-1 Avionics Application Software Standard Interface, Part 5, Core Software Recommended Capabilities". SAE ITC. 2019-08-07. Retrieved 2022-02-04.
  11. ^ ""AMC-20 Amendment 23"". EASA. 2022-12-26. Retrieved 2022-12-22.
  12. ^ a b "Flexibility and Manageability of IMS Projects" (PDF). University of York. Retrieved 2008-07-27.

See also

edit